On the 27th of November 2020, 51.9 per cent of Swiss voters voted ‘No’ in a
referendum revising the Swiss Hunting Act of 1986. In Switzerland, wolves will continue to be a
nationally protected species.
Prior to 1986, wolves were extinct in Switzerland for 25 years, as a result of a campaign to wipe
out the species across central Europe. This was due to misconceived fear surrounding the animal
and a long-term conflict between wolves and farmers. In efforts to reintroduce the species,
the Hunting Act of 1986 was passed and remains in place to this day, only allowing the hunting
of a lone wolf if it attacks at least 25 sheep in one month or 35 sheep across four months.
Switzerland has seen a successful return of the apex predator, crossing over from the French-Italian
Alps and even travelling as far as from the Czech Republic. They have mostly settled in the
Southeast of the small country, in the cantons of Graubünden, Glarus, St. Gallen, Ticino and Wallis.
There have been a few sightings in the more central regions of Bern and Schwyz as well.
Wolves are shy of humans, a concept many still do not understand due to deep-routed beliefs that
still exist from old folk tales. Despite this the return of the wolf has been a positive for the
country’s biodiversity, because as apex predators, wolves control the populations of 130,000 roe
deer and 35,000 red deer.
This is beneficial for the local ecosystem, as controlling populations
of large herbivores prevents them from overgrazing their habitat. If deer populations surpass the
carrying capacity of the ecosystem, it can cause the depletion of food and habitat resources required
by other organisms. A single wolf requires about two to four kilograms of meat a day, which aside
from deer, they get from wild boars and foxes.
In 2019, the Gruppe Wolf Schweiz reported around 60 individuals in the country, including six
established packs. Their re-emergence continuously sparks protests from farmers, who lose around
200 to 500 livestock individuals (95 per cent sheep, 5 per cent goats) to these predators annually.
When wolves cannot find wild prey, they will primarily steal sheep from grazing mountain herds.
However, one must keep in mind that these losses are only 0.02 to 0.07 per cent of the total 506,000
livestock individuals in the country.
Despite this small percentage, there is still uproar from farmers affected by these losses. The
attacks on livestock are directly correlated to the density of wolves in a region, and as most
of the country’s wolves are concentrated in the southwest, the percentage of losses are unequally
distributed amongst the sheep farmers. In July of 2020, a sheep farmer in the canton of Graubünden,
an area with perhaps the most wolves, had reported that he has lost a total of 59 sheep to the
predators. As a result, he has had to install electric fences costing up to €32,000 out of his own pocket.
Votes to be able to hunt wolves re-entered the Swiss parliament last summer. This revision of the
1986 law has mostly been driven by the growing tensions between farmers and wildlife in rural areas.
In the Alps, sheep farmers tend to keep herds varying between 20 individuals and 1,000 individuals.
Farmers do not get funds from their regional governments in order to implement measures for
protecting their livestock herds, and those left unprotected are naturally an attractive and easy
prey option for wolves residing in the area.
Farmers, however, do get compensated for each livestock that gets killed by a wolf or lynx. The money
comes from the state, specifically from the fee that hunters need to pay in order to participate in
the hunting seasons. It should be noted that they do not receive compensation for the thousands more
livestock they lose due to illness and falling off cliffs.
Due to concerns about the growing wolf population, the Swiss Parliament passed a revised Hunting Act
in November of 2019. It outlined that one could proactively hunt wolves, in order to protect agricultural
livestock. This new law not only threatened wolves, but also beavers, ibexes and lynx. It would have
essentially allowed the culling of non-problematic wolves as a ‘preventative measure’.
After collecting 260,000 signatures, environmental groups pushed a national vote on the revised Hunting
Act on the 27th November 2020. Just over half the voters voted against the act, meaning the law of 1986
remains. The results show that the majority of voter turnout are for a peaceful co-existence between
humans and wolves. However, the outcome also highlights the stark contrast in attitude between urban
and rural areas, where most in support of the revised act reside in the countryside and those against
in the cities.
In order for farmers and wolves to co-exist peacefully, the state should offer funding to support the
implementation of mitigation measures. If need be, the money required for these measures should come
from raising the prices of agricultural products. Protective measures against wolves include the use
of shepherds, herd dogs and electric fences – all of which need to be paid by farmers themselves.
One can therefore understand the position of the Swiss farmers. The only financial support they get
from the regional government as a protective measure, is to relocate their herds when an increased
number of wolf attacks have occurred on livestock in the region. Although the failure to pass the
revised Hunting Act is a win for biodiversity, it means that the threat to farmer’s livelihood continues.
From an environmental perspective, the outcome of the vote to keep the 1986 Hunting Act in place is a
reason to celebrate. In addition, Gruppe Wolf Schweiz reported three newly established packs at the end
of 2020, bringing the county’s total up to nine.
Once hunted to extinction, perhaps wolves can now call Switzerland home.
Thurnherr, W. (2020) 'Referendum gegen die Änderung vom 27. September 2019 des Bundesgesetzes über die Jagd und den Schutz wildlebender Säugetiere und Vögel (Jagdgesetz, JSG). Zustandekommen.'
Fedlex.admin.ch. Schweizer Bundesrat.
Available at: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2020/183/de
[Accessed March 22nd 2021]